Today was one of those few days I when I thought about these people that are in every corner of my life. I was looking for a key to our stairway door, and popped by the security guard’s window on the way out of the apartment.
You’ll have to ask the concierge, I can’t go up those stairs. Or even go into the lobby or the parking lot. They barely even let me in here, he said, pointing to the small, cramped security guard booth.
It’s the sort of job most likely to go to Venezuela’s most luckless. These are folks that live in and don’t have highschool degrees or marketable skills. It’s a clear isolation on the other side of the luxurious office towers and swanky apartment buildings to industrial warehouses and buildings in construction. With crime an increasing concern in Venezuela, the vigilante is a fixture of life.
Fifty years ago maybe they would have been cutting cane, lifting blocks or hauling salt. Today that manual labor has been replaced with constant boredom, texting and fiddling with a cell phone, and the struggle to stay awake on shifts that often last 24 hours at a time – one day on, one day off. A one-liner I heard not long ago summed it up fairly well – Ando mas ladillado que un vigilante sin saldo … I’m in a worse mood that a security guard with no credit on his phone.
I’ve always thought it questionable what sort of security they can really provide under these circumstances, particularly given that they’re going to be the first in the line of fire if something does happen. Nobody with any means would consider living in a building without a vigilante, but almost nobody trusts them.
“Whenever something goes wrong, the first one they blame is the vigilante,” said the security guard at my mother-in-law’s lower-middle-class gated community after a house was robbed a block away. The kid’s got a technical degree and trying to finish highschool but he can’t get his studies done while on the job. My in-laws get along well with him and his coworkers, taking them food on holidays and cracking jokes on the way in and out of the gate.
That’s not the usual relationship. In one apartment I lived in, the landlord was shocked when I asked him to leave the key with the security guards. “With those criminals? Are you crazy?”
Trouble is I can understand the mistrust. These are folks at the edge of poverty and simultaneously at the edge of opulence. They live in hillside slums that generally function as little villages, everybody knows everybody and everybody knows everybody’s business. My gut instinct says it’s not the security guards themselves that get mixed up in crime. But something tells me it’s only a matter of time before some true criminal approaches them and asks them for some small piece of information that would enable a break-in, a car theft, a kidnapping. Many would probably back away. I can imagine many others would not.
Investigations of apartment break-ins nearly always turn up evidence that the people who did the hit had some kind of inside information that helped them do it. That is almost always followed by genuine shock and consternation that such information could have gotten out. People in Caracas do all sorts of other things to take their security seriously – a battery of car alarms, triple locks on doors, electric fences and security cameras. Rarely does anyone mention the idea of paying for security guards whose social conditions might allow them to live further away from the criminal elements they are supposed to protect folks from.
Brian,
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed the piece, I just posted a link to it in my blog.
For a less romantic vision of "guachimanes" (which, incidentally, really should have been the title of the piece), try this
http://cagaepais.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/historias-de-guachimanes/
Saludos.
El Vigilante, good piece !
ReplyDeleteIn regards to Guachiman, the word comes from the the early times of oil companies ( watch-man), in the 1940s, when Venezuela was a rural country with a population of no more than 3.7 million and in Caracas area not more than 400.000 personas.
ReplyDeleteAt that time, the oil companies needed to employ some one completely trustworthy to look out for the installations and equipment when they were absent.
At that time the Guachiman was a 100% trustworthy person, the oil companies, ranchers and buildings owners, employ them and treated with high regards, they new were he live, his family, they usually were godfather of their children, it was a complete different kind of worker, one you can depend on.
By the 1960's, el Guachiman was still strong and they were use in the apartment buildings at night and he was more like a Sereno
(a Spanish type on night conserje) definitely he was part of the community of the building, and you sure depended on him.
In the 70-80's things radically changed, the concept of vigilantes came about with private companies offering the service (well a poor one). In 1979, I participate in a study to set up the policy of the Metro of Caracas security ( patrimonial, and operational) and after a complete study conducted by a very reputable Venezuelan security company , the Metro decided the only way we can guaranty the security of the installations, was with our own vigilantes with a backup by the GN (installations only).
It was very costly to get all this low skill labor in the Metro payroll, but there was not alternative, not out sourcing possibility; the vigilantes from the private companies were definitely not trustworthy.
At this moment in some buildings, the residents have decided that is better to be without vigilantes, than to pay one.
The rest is in your story !
Thanks for the responses, Elio and Juan. I've heard the term guachimanes a lot, but don't find that people actually refer to them that way in day-to-day conversation.
ReplyDeleteI think times have changed a lot, vigilantes are very rarely part of the community. There are companies these days that provide extensively trained and highly qualified Navy Seal types that actually know how to do this stuff and can be trusted. It's usually banks and oil companies that can afford that kind of security. It's sad.
Interesting observations. An example of security I saw for a group of upper middle class homeowners in a suburban subdivision was to hire a boy- could not have been more than 16 or 17- to ride around the block on a bmx bicycle with a shotgun over his shoulder. I had to ask myself, how did the kid learn to use the gun (or perhaps equally disconcerting- did he)? As your observations reveal, I think, many Venezuelans in the old or the new elite have a tendancy to want and expect the trappings of privilege -guards, drivers, people to iron their shirts, care for their children while they shop/travel/get their nails done - without paying the full cost of it (i.e. observing basic labour standards: hours, min. wage, safety; providing suitable training, education, etc.). For all the years of railing against the stupidity of events in the political sphere, it sometimes strikes me the lack of soul searching going on on all sides- the kind that might arise from more observations like yours. Imagine that- employing marginalized people under marginal (illegal, unregulated, informal, demeaning etc)conditions for protection from the symptoms of marginalization!
ReplyDeleteThanks Peter, I agree that the marginalization is the really critical issue. Some working conditions are better than others, but I believe that in many of them the vigilantes are treated as potential criminals. I've always really worried about them carrying weapons, particularly they're own, because I don't think they're trained in how to use them or more importantly in how to react in the event of a robbery or an assault. Everybody talks about crime, and somehow nobody talks about this.
ReplyDelete